Why did john locke believe it was irrational to attempt to force someone to become a christian again

The conclusion tends to be that Locke is holding on to moral rationalism in the face of serious incoherence. As such, it is possible for the rational individual to see clearly that the ideas of absolute liberty and government cannot agree.

John Locke’s Irrationality Argument

They do this in order to acquire mutual protection of their "lives, liberties, and estates" from those who in a state of nature would be of danger to them, by means of placing the retaliatory use of physical force in under "established, settled, known law," interpreted by an "indifferent judge," with the "power to support the sentence when right.

The fact that many people do not or cannot devote contemplative hours to their moral duties is something Locke will consider in his account of moral motivation, however, the key point here is that humans have a teleological makeup that allows for rational certainty with regard to divine moral law. Jolley, Nicholas,Locke: The rules that govern human conduct are specifically tailored to human nature, and our duty to God involves realizing our natures to the fullest degree.

But, our understanding of natural law is not founded solely in sensory experience. In a letter written to Locke on September 16th,Molyneux presses Locke to work on a moral treatise once he has finished editing the second edition of his Essay, writing as follows: English writers such as John EvelynJohn AubreyJohn Eachardand John Milton had previously advocated "similar reforms in curriculum and teaching methods," but they had not succeeded in reaching a wide audience.

All such qualities can be explained by reference to matter in motion. Nothing was made by God for man to spoil or destroy. Suppose that these books are so powerful that they could shake the faith of Muslims.

Second, they govern by "declared and received laws [i. The emphasis here is on sanctions, and how rewards and punishments serve to provide morality with its normative force. Oxford University Press, As Locke sees it, our capacities as rational agents are insufficiently realized in many, if not most, cases.

That it also carries the threat of sanctions lends motivational force to the law. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg.

Such contemplation would lead any rational being to the conclusion that the world cannot be the result of chance, and must therefore be the product of a creative will. Locke does not provide any defence against this charge. Locke —64, Thus, sanctions are not the sole motivating factor for Locke.

Modal ideas are ideas by which we fully grasp the real essence of things, because the mind, in some sense, is the originator of them I will return to this in the next paragraph. But, what is most interesting for our purposes is just what the remote subject was that first got Locke and his friends thinking about fundamental questions of epistemology.In Edward Clarke asked his friend, John Locke, for advice on raising his son and heir, Edward, Jr.; Locke responded with a series of letters that eventually served as the basis of Some Thoughts Concerning Education.

So let us now turn to Locke’s argument that it is irrational to try to coerce someone to adopt a religious belief. Locke argued that it was irrational because a religious belief is not something that can be adopted at will. This is a direct challenge to the rationality of religious persecution which has as much resonance today as it did over years ago.

Ultimately John Locke considered any use of force/compulsion to attempt to change people into becoming a Christian against their will a red herring, an impossible feat and a waste of time by rulers, ergo irrational. The Political Philosophy of John Locke, and therefore have no right to even attempt to force their opinions on others.

"For there being but one truth what hope is there that more men would be led into it if they had no rule but the religion of the court and were put under the necessity to quit the light of their own reason, and oppose.

Why did John Locke believe it was irrational to attempt to force someone to become a Christian against their will 17th century philosopher John Locke wrote ‘A Letter Concerning Toleration’ (Locke ) in a time when religious intolerance among different Christian faiths was endemic throughout Europe.

Locke's Moral Philosophy

John Locke was a Unitarian; cautious, conservative and scriptural; in all three respects resembling most Unitarians [before the nineteenth century]" (). Formally, Locke belonged to the dominant Anglican Church, but within the Anglican Church, he was an advocate of the broad church, or latitudinarianism.

Why did john locke believe it was irrational to attempt to force someone to become a christian again
Rated 3/5 based on 19 review