The status quo is maintained and fuelled according to the wants of the dominant group or else the haves in the society. The law helps to keep society running well because it enforces rules that a society has developed together over time. According to this perspective, the society upholds the necessity to maintain the status quo and if an individual goes against what is accepted and shared by the majority that person is considered as deviant.
In this view, the laws are imposed by whatever group prevails in conflict within the society. It was Karl Marx who initiated this approach of viewing the society through the inequalities in society that gives rise to class conflicts.
From the consensus perspective, mutual commitment, trust, and conversation are important to build fruitful relationships.
They believe that the society and social order are based on the powerful and the dominant groups of society. In other words consensus theory is concerned with the maintenance or continuation of social order in society.
Conflict is a disagreement or clash between opposing ideas, principles, or people-this can be a covert or overt conflict. The foundation of consensus perspective is the assumption that societies have an inherent tendency to maintain themselves in a state of relative equilibrium through the mutually and supportive interaction of their principal institutions.
The consensus theory pays little importance to social change as they focus more on retaining the society as it is through consensus. This article attempts to highlight the differences between these two theories through the provision of a better understanding The consensus perspective essay the two theories.
The consensus perspective approach also assumes that effective maintenance of a particular form of society is in the common interest of all its members. Instead, they are intertwined and coexist in relational interaction.
What is Conflict Theory? Society is full of conflict between different groups men and women, different economic classes, different races and ethnicities, etc.
The groups that win their conflicts get to make the laws. They then make laws that will help to keep them in power and will help to keep their antagonists in a subordinate position. In order to perform the project task at hand, actors form relationships aimed at cooperation.The Consensus Perspective Essay - Criminologists have long tried to fight crime and they have developed many theories along the way as tools to help them understand criminals.
In the process of doing so, criminologist have realized that in order to really understand why criminals are criminals, they had to first understand the interrelationship.
Writing sample of essay on a given topic "Differences Between Consensus And Conflict" Differences Between Consensus and Conflict Theories Two theories attempt to explain human behavior- conflict and consensus theories. Consensus theory asserts that the social order can be attained through having shared norms, beliefs, and values.
Consensus, conflict, and pluralist perspectives: A brief analysis essay writing service, custom Consensus, conflict, and pluralist perspectives: A brief analysis papers, term papers, free Consensus, conflict, and pluralist perspectives: A brief analysis samples, research papers, help.
Free Essay: "The foundation of consensus perspective is the assumption that societies have an inherent tendency to maintain themselves in a state of. Consensus is the more optimistic side of determining law versus conflict perspective which is more negative because people of a higher social status.
View Full Essay. The consensus perspective advocates believe that crime exists because there are members of society “who fail to participate in the social consensus” (Agnew, ), arguing that these people are “low is self-control and lack the abilities to resist the temptations and provocations for crime” (Agnew, ).Download