There is the fact that she refuses to accept that her father is dead, keeping his body in the house till townspeople eventually came to bury him. What is also interesting about the towns leaders view on Miss Emily and her taxes is her response to them.
Is it worth sticking to an old bond when it is obsolete? This may be important as it suggests an inability by the townspeople to accept the changes that would have occurred after the civil war. It is also by the end of the story that the reader senses that nobody in the town really knew who Miss Emily was.
Emily, in contrast to Sarti, does not become independent from her father. Other symbolism in the story may include the mail box that Miss Emily refuses to allow outside the house.
Homer is a Yankee, something that bothers the townspeople. There is also a sense of irony in the story. By killing Homer she has in some way ensured that she will not be alone, however she has also ensured that she will be isolated from the other townspeople.
It is possible that Miss Emily was once open to or in love. There are other A rose for emily vs barn in the story in which the reader senses that Miss Emily is unable to let go.
This is significant as it suggests that Miss Emily is still rooted in the past which in turn suggests that she is still living her life bound by old traditions. Through the narrator, the reader gets an insight into the opinions of the townspeople when it came to Miss Emily but there is never a clear picture.
The Sitting Bee, 6 Aug. Miss Emily may not have been prepared to live her life alone and by killing Homer and sleeping with him she was in some way assuring herself that she would not be alone.
There also appears to be some symbolism in the story which may be significant. Again this would suggest an inability by Miss Emily to let go. Again Faulkner could be using symbolism to suggest the idea of love, a rose being a commonly accepted symbol of love. In many ways by being different to other people, Miss Emily ensures that she remains isolated.
It also suggests that Miss Emily is unable to let go of the past, a past in whereby she was once thought of as superior to others. The basic similarity is that both stories explore the extent to which maintaining ties with the past actually helps us move into the future. Faulkner tells the stories of Emily and Hence, although there is a detour in theme in terms of the individual experiences of each character, the overall theme of tradition versus independent thinking permeate both stories in a great way.
The ties of the Old South are questioned in both stories: Cite Post McManus, Dermot. Also at the end of the story it becomes clear to the reader that Miss Emily has never let go of Homer, despite killing him, she still kept his body in her bedroom, going as far as sleeping with him.
He is part of a tradition that she is not prepared to let go of. Symbolically this could suggest that Miss Emily is not prepared to change, preferring to live her life as she always has. In their eyes Miss Emily is no different to anybody else in the town.
However, as time changes, so does the treatment given to Emily, which she strongly resents. It is through her one connection, with Homer, that she has isolated herself from everybody else. It is also possible that Miss Emily killed Homer because he may have decided not to marry her and was in the process of leaving her, which would bring into play the theme of loneliness.
In "Barn Burning" a perennial theme is family versus society. Despite Colonel Sartoris being dead for ten years Miss Emily instructs the men to talk to him.
This is significant as it suggests a change in tradition from the time of Colonel Sartoris. Moreover, Emily is also bound to the wishes of her father: Faulkner tells the stories of Emily and Sarti considering the perspective of the modern reader and how the current views of the world affect the interpretation of life in the Old South.
Rather, he dies leaving her devastated and even weaker.Free Essay: In "Barn Burning," and "A Rose for Emily" William Faulkner creates two characters that are strikingly similar.
Abner Snopes. Barn Burning vs. A Rose For Emily essaysThe New Vs. The Old in "A Rose for Emily" and "Barn Burning" William Faulkner's "A Rose for Emily" and "Barn Burning" both are an imaginary fiction of a Mississippi country in Yoknapatawpha.
Each story is symboli. In the short stories “Barn Burning” and “A Rose for Emily,” Faulkner shows how people with two completely different lives, could share the same kind of problems and both people try and solve their problems in the same way.
When these people have bad. Hunter Taylor Dr. William Bedford English 10 September Comparing and Contrasting “A Rose for Emily” and “Barn Burning” In William Faulkne.
Get an answer for 'In tone and style, how does "Barn Burning" compare to "A Rose for Emily"?' and find homework help for other Barn Burning questions at eNotes.
William Faulkner is known as one America's greatest authors. In fact, his short stories, "Barn Burning," and "A Rose for Emily," are two of the best-known stories in American literature.Download